Skip to main content
AdCheckNew Zealand

ACT Party

Analysed ad truthfulness

Overall analysed-ad score

4.7/ 10
Low confidence3 ads analysed

Factual accuracy

6.0/ 10

Context fairness

3.7/ 10

Evidence quality

4.3/ 10

Visual/audio fairness

3.0/ 10

Verdict distribution

Misleading: 1
Partly true: 1
Unverifiable: 1

Scores are based only on ads analysed by this site. They do not represent an overall judgement of ACT Party or its candidates.

Analysed ads

ACT Party

Mining

6.1/ 10
Partly trueimage

The ad contrasts the Greens' opposition to a gold mine with a news headline saying OceanaGold is expected to pay nearly $200 million in New Zealand tax and royalties, followed by the line "When they spend the mining money." The factual core is that the Greens have opposed the Waihi North expansion and other hard-rock gold mining approved through the fast-track process, while mining does generate substantial Crown tax and royalty revenue. The ad's suggestion of hypocrisy is political framing: mining revenue goes to the Crown rather than being a distinct pot of money that the Greens personally or specifically choose to spend.

Analysed 9 August 2026

ACT Party

Tax

5.3/ 10
Misleadingimage

The ad says: "The Greens' taxes don't stop when you do" and claims their inheritance tax would "take 33% from gifts and inheritances over $1 million." The Green Party's published 2026 policy does propose a 33% Capital Acquisitions Tax on the portion of taxable gifts or inheritances above $1 million. However, the ad omits major exemptions, including the family home, family farms, Māori land and certain Treaty-settlement assets, and its wording can imply that 33% applies to the entire inheritance rather than only the amount above the threshold.

Analysed 9 August 2026

ACT Party

Education

2.6/ 10
Unverifiableimage

The ad presents a split-screen contrast: "Labour" is paired with the word "Indoctrination" and an image of children looking at electronic devices, while "ACT" is paired with "Education" and an image of an adult engaging with children. The clear message is that Labour's approach to schooling amounts to indoctrination whereas ACT's represents education. The ad gives no specific policy, lesson, curriculum content, quotation, or example explaining what it considers indoctrination.

Analysed 9 August 2026